Glossary
Selected key terms pertaining to medical device development are listed below with References.
Key Terms
[ISO 14971:2019]
Note: Safety can be divided into two parts:
1. Clinical safety - safety from clinical complications
2. Technical safety - safety from medical device hazards
Example: Recycling, destruction.
Note: In a nonconforming service situation, use is precluded by discontinuing the service.
[ISO 9000:2015]
[IEC 62304:2015]
[ISO/TR 24971:2020]
a) is life threatening,
b) results in permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure, or
c) necessitates medical or surgical intervention to prevent permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure
[FDA 21CFR803]
Note 1: The dominant elements of a service are generally intangible.
Note 2: Service often involves activities at the interface with the customer to establish customer requirements as well as upon delivery of the service and can involve a continuing relationship such as banks, accountancies or public organizations, e.g. schools or hospitals.
Note 3: Provision of a service can involve, for example, the following:
— an activity performed on a customer-supplied tangible product (e.g. a car to be repaired);
— an activity performed on a customer-supplied intangible product (e.g. the income statement needed to prepare a tax return);
— the delivery of an intangible product (e.g. the delivery of information in the context of knowledge transmission);
— the creation of ambience for the customer (e.g. in hotels and restaurants);
Note 4: A service is generally experienced by the customer.
[ISO 9000:2015]
[OLRC 21USC9]
[EU MDR 2017/745]
[ISO 11139:2018]
[FDA guidance: Deciding When to Submit...(2014)]
Notes:
• SaMD is a medical device and includes in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical device.
• SaMD is capable of running on general purpose (non-medical purpose) computing platforms
• “without being part of” means software not necessary for a hardware medical device to achieve its intended medical purpose;
• Software does not meet the definition of SaMD if its intended purpose is to drive a hardware medical device.
• SaMD may be used in combination (e.g., as a module) with other products including medical devices;
• SaMD may be interfaced with other medical devices, including hardware medical devices and other SaMD software, as well as general purpose software
• Mobile apps that meet the definition above are considered SaMD.
[IMDRF/SaMD WG/N10:2013, IMDRF/SaMD WG/N12:2014]
Note: Three terms identify the software decomposition. The top level is the software system. The lowest level that is not further decomposed is the software unit. All levels of composition, including the top and bottom levels, can be called software items. A software system, then, is composed of one or more software items, and each software item is composed of one or more software units or decomposable software items. The responsibility is left to the manufacturer to provide the granularity of the software items and software units.
[IEC 62304:2015]
[IEC 62304:2015]
Note: The granularity of software units is defined by the manufacturer
[IEC 62304:2015]
[FDA 21CFR820]
[FDA website: Who Must Register...]
Note: The term “interested party” can be used as an alternative to “stakeholder”.
[ISO 31000:2018]
Note: The state of the art embodies what is currently and generally accepted as good practice in technology and medicine. The state of the art does not necessarily imply the most technologically advanced solution. The state of the art described here is sometimes referred to as the “generally acknowledged state of the art”.
[ISO 14971:2019]
Note: The requirements for sterility of a medical device can be subject to applicable regulatory requirements or standards.
[ISO 13485:2016]
Note: In a sterilization process, the nature of microbial inactivation is exponential and thus the survival of a microorganism on an individual item can be expressed in terms of probability. While this probability can be reduced to a very low number, it can never be reduced to zero.
[ISO 11139:2018]
[FDA 21CFR806]
[FDA 21CFR812]
Note: Depending on the study, a subject can be either a healthy individual or a patient.
[ISO 20916:2019]
[ISO 20916:2019]
Note: This includes healthy volunteers.
[ISO 14155:2020]
Note 1: A device is substantially equivalent if, in comparison to a predicate it: has the same intended use as the predicate; and has the same technological characteristics as the predicate; or has the same intended use as the predicate; and has different technological characteristics and does not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness; and the information submitted to FDA demonstrates that the device is at least as safe and effective as the legally marketed device.
Note 2: A claim of substantial equivalence does not mean the new and predicate devices must be identical. Substantial equivalence is established with respect to intended use, design, energy used or delivered, materials, chemical composition, manufacturing process, performance, safety, effectiveness, labeling, biocompatibility, standards, and other characteristics, as applicable.
Note 3: A device may not be marketed in the U.S. until the submitter receives a letter declaring the device substantially equivalent. If FDA determines that a device is not substantially equivalent, the applicant may: resubmit another 510(k) with new data, request a Class I or II designation through the De Novo Classification process, file a reclassification petition, or submit a premarket approval application (PMA).
[FDA website: Premarket Notification 510(k)]
Medical device developers are strongly encouraged to consult the listed reference for each key term to fully understand the context behind the definition and its intended application.
Definitions from the FDA Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) are listed without dates and are accurate through December 2020. Consult the listed FDA reference (online) to confirm the latest definition.